As with so many things if you just read the headlines you might miss the reality.

Amazingly enough from the New York Times, not normally known for publishing stories on the reality of the situation rather than the news worthy story line. I guess it just happens to be a subject where they prefer the reality gets a chance at being heard. (You need a free registration to read the full article).

Like the testimony at the Dover trial it shows that when it comes to the hard science questions ID proponents are left holding the bag.

While this Reuters article limits coverge to the political and sociological basis of the arguement.